Work package 3
This work package will examine to which extent the context of education serves as a source of as well as a potential tool to tackle gender inequality. More specifically, we will take a closer look at gendered educational choices. Gendered educational choices are education-related choices that are in line with gender stereotypes and gender-based expectations of how girls and boys should feel, think, and act (Brownhill et al., 2015; Eagly & Wood, 2012; Ellemers, 2018; Eccles & Wigfield, 2020). A choice within the educational context might, for instance, be the choice between taking an advanced course in Literature versus Physics. On the individual level, a gendered choice in this context would be if boys disproportionately choose Physics and girls disproportionately choose Literature. On the societal level, gendered educational choices result in an overrepresentation of girls/women and underrepresentation of boys/men in some fields such as HEED (healthcare, early education, domestic; Croft et al., 2015; Meeussen et al, 2020) as well as an overrepresentation of boys/men and an underrepresentation of girls/women in some fields such as STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics; Belanger et al., 2020). In the first phase, we will identify key leverages to change gendered norms and decisions in education and map existing tools and interventions. In the second phase, we will develop tools and interventions to help reduce gendered educational choices and assess these in diverse cultural contexts. There are six deliverables within Work Package 3 that are part of three consecutive steps: